<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image Suppression: How it Hurts Your Efforts and Depresses Your Deliverability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bronto.com/2008/03/27/image-suppression-how-it-hurts-your-efforts-and-depresses-your-deliverability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bronto.com/2008/03/27/image-suppression-how-it-hurts-your-efforts-and-depresses-your-deliverability/</link>
	<description>Email marketing insights from Bronto Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Nagle</title>
		<link>http://blog.bronto.com/2008/03/27/image-suppression-how-it-hurts-your-efforts-and-depresses-your-deliverability/comment-page-1/#comment-3531</link>
		<dc:creator>John Nagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bronto.com/2008/03/27/image-suppression-how-it-hurts-your-efforts-and-depresses-your-deliverability/#comment-3531</guid>
		<description>The phrase &quot;Click here to view in your browser&quot; puts incoming emails into my &quot;Bulk&quot; folder.

So does the use of &quot;Bonded Spammer&quot; (now &quot;Sender Score Certified&quot;). Ironport really blew that one. A few years ago, Ironport was selling both spam-filtering appliances and rackmount spamming engines. Their security customers were so angry that Ironport had to exit the spam engine business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase &#8220;Click here to view in your browser&#8221; puts incoming emails into my &#8220;Bulk&#8221; folder.</p>
<p>So does the use of &#8220;Bonded Spammer&#8221; (now &#8220;Sender Score Certified&#8221;). Ironport really blew that one. A few years ago, Ironport was selling both spam-filtering appliances and rackmount spamming engines. Their security customers were so angry that Ironport had to exit the spam engine business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Deneweth</title>
		<link>http://blog.bronto.com/2008/03/27/image-suppression-how-it-hurts-your-efforts-and-depresses-your-deliverability/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Deneweth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bronto.com/2008/03/27/image-suppression-how-it-hurts-your-efforts-and-depresses-your-deliverability/#comment-583</guid>
		<description>There really is no other way to track when one of your subscribers opens an email message from you.  Keep in mind, open rates haven’t been accurate since the invention of the preview pane, and not even then.  There has always been a portion of the email reading public using email readers that are not capable of displaying images.  Early on this was common, and it’s coming around again as mobile devices often display only text.   

The focus should be on other metrics that are more meaningful.   Click-through rates and conversions are more meaningful and accurate.  Inbox delivery rates are a critical measure, as are complaint rates and unknown user rates.  These numbers are extremely relevant to the health and success of your email programs.  Whether someone complains about receiving a specific email message from you (by hitting the ‘spam’ button) can tell you a great deal, and give you priceless data to improve your future subscriber experience.  

However, tracking open rates isn’t a dead art just yet.  Used as a relative measure, comparing one campaign to the next, the data is still useful.  There is good news yet, that it is still possible to increase open rates, by joining a whitelist program like Sender Score Certified or Goodmail, which enable images and links by default at key ISPs.  This will increase your open rates, because the tracking images will be ‘displayed’.  Additionally, you can still encourage your subscribers to add you to their address book, or safe senders list, depending on the email reader they use.  This will enable your images to be displayed despite the default setting, allowing you to count these opens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really is no other way to track when one of your subscribers opens an email message from you.  Keep in mind, open rates haven’t been accurate since the invention of the preview pane, and not even then.  There has always been a portion of the email reading public using email readers that are not capable of displaying images.  Early on this was common, and it’s coming around again as mobile devices often display only text.   </p>
<p>The focus should be on other metrics that are more meaningful.   Click-through rates and conversions are more meaningful and accurate.  Inbox delivery rates are a critical measure, as are complaint rates and unknown user rates.  These numbers are extremely relevant to the health and success of your email programs.  Whether someone complains about receiving a specific email message from you (by hitting the ‘spam’ button) can tell you a great deal, and give you priceless data to improve your future subscriber experience.  </p>
<p>However, tracking open rates isn’t a dead art just yet.  Used as a relative measure, comparing one campaign to the next, the data is still useful.  There is good news yet, that it is still possible to increase open rates, by joining a whitelist program like Sender Score Certified or Goodmail, which enable images and links by default at key ISPs.  This will increase your open rates, because the tracking images will be ‘displayed’.  Additionally, you can still encourage your subscribers to add you to their address book, or safe senders list, depending on the email reader they use.  This will enable your images to be displayed despite the default setting, allowing you to count these opens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rogers</title>
		<link>http://blog.bronto.com/2008/03/27/image-suppression-how-it-hurts-your-efforts-and-depresses-your-deliverability/comment-page-1/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bronto.com/2008/03/27/image-suppression-how-it-hurts-your-efforts-and-depresses-your-deliverability/#comment-581</guid>
		<description>If image suppression hurts open rate tracking, is Bronto - and/or the industry as a whole - looking at alternative/better ways of tracking open rates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If image suppression hurts open rate tracking, is Bronto &#8211; and/or the industry as a whole &#8211; looking at alternative/better ways of tracking open rates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
